Q.
Most prayer leaders are faced with many practical issues, thus they
have little time for theology and history. What are the critical
theological questions every prayer leader must think about that will
form their personal theology of prayer?
First,
no one, especially a prayer leader, should be so busy that they have no
time for theology or history. I do not believe every leader should be a
theologian or a historian, in the fullest sense of these words, but
every leader needs to know the essential theological truths that form
the life and faith of a healthy Christianity. Zeal for prayer is no
excuse for ignorance of great truths like the incarnation, the Trinity,
grace, sin and forgiveness. And ignorance of history reveals a certain
lack of humility. It is as if we are saying, consciously or not, that
we know great truths directly and owe nothing to anyone who went before
us in God’s saving of His people throughout all of history. Every
single one of us owes a great deal to many who lived and died before we
came on the scene. History acknowledges this and seeks to learn from
what others can teach us if we are humble enough to listen.
What
“critical theological issues” then should every prayer leader think
about “that will form their personal theology of prayer”? I may
surprise you but I would begin with the doctrine of the Trinity. I
believe we assume this truth and do very little to understand how this
distinctly Christian truth informs everything we do in worship and
prayer. If the God we seek is an eternal Trinity, living in communion
within the three distinct persons, then when we pray we enter into the
communion of the three persons. How should we address God? How does our
seeking the will of God in our prayer life work in terms of the unity
within the Godhead? What, to be very specific, does the relationship of
the Father to the Son have to do with our prayer life?
A
second critical theological truth that must impact our prayer life is
the doctrine of providence. Is God all-powerful and what does this mean
for my asking Him to answer my prayer? When I pray how do I avoid
fatalism, on the one hand, and manipulation on the other?
A
third great theological truth that busy prayer leaders need to give
attention to is the doctrine of the church. We evangelicals have a “low
church” theology, often because of our reaction against Catholicism. We
need to recover both a high Christology and a higher ecclesiology, or
doctrine of the church. The New Testament is replete with the emphasis
that God saves us as part of a body of people, a family, and a
community. We are not lone rangers when we pray. We are members one of
another.
A
fourth great theological truth that prayer leaders should think about
is the ministry of the Holy Spirit. I know this is assumed, and much
work on the Holy Spirit has been done from within the prayer movement.
But errors about the person and ministry of the Holy Spirit still
abound. I think the singular most important text in the Bible, at least
in this regard, is Luke 11:13. Here Jesus explicitly tells us that “the
heavenly Father [will] give the Holy Spirit to those who ask him,” yet
I see few who ask. Pentecostals often assume that they have Him,
because of some marvelous past experience of God, while
non-Pentecostals assume that they have the Spirit simply because they
are believers and have all that they will ever need. Something is going
on in this text that doesn’t neatly fit into these two systems. It is
critical, I believe, that we seek a richer, fuller understanding of
this matter if we would strengthen the prayer movement.
Q.
What should we have learned from Christian history that can guide
prayer leaders as they face day-to-day, week-to-week and even
year-to-year issues?
If
we knew Christian history better we would know about men like George
Whitefield and John Wesley, or Adoniram Judson and Charles Spurgeon. We
would know about women like Terese of Lisieux and Catherine Booth. We
would know real people with real struggles who faced real problems just
like our own.
By
knowing the lives of such people, and by having some knowledge of the
big story of Christian history, we would more clearly understand that
almost every problem we face today has been dealt with in the past. We
would know where to find solid answers and how to avoid the fads and
extremes, which we do not handle well at the present time. We would
also avoid making extravagant claims about our own ministries and glean
rich insights from how others struggled in prayer, often for years,
before they saw amazing answers. History humbles you if you read it
correctly. We could stand a larger dose of humility today since we seem
to talk a great deal about the next amazing thing that we are about to
undertake for God because we are a special people.
I
believe that we would also understand how worldliness hinders our
prayer ministries. This is true precisely because it is worldliness,
which is not the created world but rather the way the world thinks and
acts without hearing and obeying the Word of God that creates apathy
and false comfort. We grow too comfortable with this world’s way of
doing things and fail to see how techniques also hinder prayer
movements. We keep looking for new techniques and Christ is looking for
a people who know their only hope is in Him alone. Our best
contribution to the prayer movement is to know how weak and powerless
we really are without Him. The apostle did plainly say, “God chose the
weak in the world to shame the strong” (1 Cor. 1:27b). We act as if
this is not true when we build our movements on strength rather than
weakness. The world will never understand this truth, indeed it cannot.
By the power of the Spirit, we can and should understand it and lean
into it.
Christian
history will also reveal that the debates we have about ritual, form
prayers, and liturgy are often wrongly argued. Even the great John
Wesley understood that as powerful as free and spontaneous prayer was
we should never assume this is the right (or only) way to pray. In
fact, Wesley rightly said that if you listen long enough to
extemporaneous prayers you will begin to hear the same form and words
prayed in the same way. Is this not itself a new form of ritualism?
Growing up in a free-church context, where liturgy was frankly
despised, we became very proud of our spontaneous prayers I think. But
I noticed, while still a young boy that the same words were used week
after week when we prayed.
Q. Are you encouraged or concerned about the prayer movement’s progress and direction over the past 15 years or so?
Actually
I am encouraged by the big picture of things. I think the movement
shows evidence of growing up in grace and seeking a richer and fuller
understanding of the truth of Christ. We also seem less preoccupied
with the techniques I referred to above. We are looking for help, for
example, to encourage prayer and to feed other strands of biblical
insight into the movement, but we are not as focused on right methods
and big personalities as we were at one point. Prayer has a way of
doing this since the focus is not on preaching, teaching or singing. I
also think the movement is growing beyond the “big person” complex that
impacts other movements in the church. When you think about the prayer
movement, for example, you do not have a huge name that stands out as
the leader. It seems that the “weak” and those who are “nothing” are
more prominent in this movement (cf. 1 Cor. 1:26–28).
My
concern for the prayer movement is that the lack of a healthy doctrine
of the Trinity, and of God’s providence, will cause it to become
another movement of pietism that fails to recover a robust Christian
confession, which is needed now more than ever. I do not think we
realize that we are able to build a prayer movement that is shaped by
worldliness, not by the Spirit. The enemy would love to destroy any
movement of prayer and will use imitation and phony piety to accomplish
his work. He is not original, and again history reveals to us how he
has done this in the past by leading movements of prayer to become
self-centered and non-confessional. We need to remember that Christ
calls us to “love God with all your mind” not just with “all your
heart” (Mt. 22:36–38). An a-theological—or worse yet an
anti-theological—movement of prayer will always be a real danger and we
must resist it without allowing denominational differences to divide
the movement or destroy us from the opposite direction.
Q.
Recently you served as an interim pastor (2004). If you were to speak
from a pastoral position to a prayer leader, what three or four
objectives would you encourage them to adopt?
I
would first encourage them to make it their goal to involve the entire
congregation in prayer, not just a handful of faithful people. This
will not be easy to do, but without it you can divide the church into
the “haves and have nots” and the result will actually destroy a real
movement of prayer. I have seen it happen. You can have special prayer
meetings and teams but make sure you lead the whole church to prayer
step-by-step.
Second,
I would encourage the leadership to saturate every thing they do in the
ministry of prayer. I have seen one false start after another where
initially good intentions are cast aside by the busy pace at which
modern church leaders operate a ministry. We must realize the work of
the church is not a business but rather a spiritual work to be done
with spiritual means. Every elders/deacons meeting should be a prayer
meeting and every worship service should be covered and immersed in
prayer. I am always excited when I show up at a church to speak and
find out this is going on. There is always a more fruitful ministry
that comes with my speaking when this is the context.
Third,
I would make it a clear objective to teach prayer. I would preach and
teach on it continually. (A series on the Lord’s Prayer was given in my
interim setting.) I would utilize the various resources that ministries
like your own provide to train people in prayer. I think we assume that
prayer is caught, not taught. It is clearly both.
Fourth,
I would create sacred space devoted to prayer. This would include a
prayer room in the church building, if possible, and designated places
for prayer during various times and seasons. We create a large place
for corporate worship, offices for staff and counseling, rooms for
Christian education, but nothing is devoted to prayer in much of our
planning for space and development.
Q.
You are one of the most widely read persons I know. What books on
prayer should every prayer leader have on their reading list?
The Complete Works of E. M. Bounds on Prayer
This particular volume includes eight different books by this nineteenth century teacher, a master on the subject.
Prayer, Karl Barth (50th Anniversary Edition)
Barth was one of the church’s greatest thinkers in the 20th century and he wrote a gem. This edition has a number of additional essays and resources that make it more valuable.
The Struggle of Prayer, Donald G. Bloesch
Rarely
does an evangelical theologian write on prayer thus this is an
important book because if treats the subject both biblically and
theologically.
With Christ in the School of Prayer, Andrew Murray
Murray wrote a number of books on prayer but this is the classic.
Prayer: History and Psychology, Friedrich Heiler (Samuel McComb, translator and editor)
Heiler was a professor of history and philosophy in Germany and there is no book on the subject that contains the breadth and scholarship of this one.
Q. Please write a prayer for those who lead or serve in their congregation’s prayer ministry?
O
Lord and heavenly Father, who has given to me the gift of service
through the ministry of prayer, grant that I may serve Your people with
clean hands and a pure heart. Give to me the love of Your dear Son so
that all I do may be enabled to serve Your people faithfully and teach
them Your truth about seeking You alone. Help me to depend entirely
upon Your Spirit so that I will humbly demonstrate to all what it means
to be strong in my human weakness. And guide my ministry of prayer so
that You will be glorified and Christ’s church renewed day-by-day
through Your almighty power.